Hello .. all and all ..
try to put up this blog to share some thoughts starting many years ago and which made a little more concrete with my thesis ..
so .. start with the introduction .. if not what else?
and then ..
-.-.-.-.-.-.-
Since the human being is endowed with the power of science has always given a name to things, dividing them and putting them in the hierarchical relationship between them. Backed by the Darwinian drive the life cycle of animals, plants and humans has always been drawn in a circle, where the largest has the upper hand on the smallest, and where even the smallest has a role and function within the system. We are always labeled forms and lives in order not to fall in ambiguity or unknown, has always preferred to give two names to something that does not give at all, the logic that if you do not see does not exist. Is this being
Wilhelm Fliess of knowledge with some verses in the book "Men and Women" is to recognize what is learned men: What they can not touch is a thousand leagues away; What they can not grasp just does not exist! What we do not calculate it is not true, What they do not weigh no weight; What is not money, do you think is good for nothing (1980, p. 24).
The solid and unchangeable certainty is that since the making of the human being is expressed through two opposing, antithetical and complementary to the contrary, that a man and a woman. These two beings are bound by a form of addiction and love inseparable: the guilt of knowledge of good and evil of original sin, paid with the submission of women to men and to God and relegated to its dual mandate as a woman and mother.
So the human race carries with it the three elements of life given to man and the woman blamed for the want of knowledge of good and evil, the subjugation of women to men and to God, the task of being the progenitors of mankind.
in history, has always lived in eras and everything revolved around the existence of the human being that has evolved in the history of homo herectus the prototype of artificial intelligence, from the hut to the great skyscraper plans that weighs a hundred tons of cement.
There has evolved, for better or for worse, sacrificing the land, and small animals in laboratories. He never, however, questioned the human race, the certainty on which every day, thousands of years we live. There has always been an allocation from the consequential biological sex has led to gender role and making it possible to establish identity. This assignment, however, has never been represented with a logical but because it acts on the immediate and culturally by society, culture and family. The birth and baptism makes this award raises ambiguity.
We can not say that there are in a "pure" donna1 man and, because they really are individuals who differ biologically to the primary and secondary sexual characteristics that belong to varying degrees over the masculine or feminine. The genus thus provides the cultural decline of the biological dimension of gender. Sexual diversity, and in any society, behaviors that are deemed appropriate to both sexes, which are shared by the group as masculine or feminine social context. Gender is learned at a time so remote and so widespread that it becomes almost innate, making the subject difficult to understand the possibilities of other values \u200b\u200band forms of behavior.
impossible to be another man and woman have always condemned and cursed those unborn ambiguous hermaphrodite and intersex.
This determines the gender dichotomy that everyday acts on the unconscious man and woman making two assumptions inherent.
affirm a gender difference among individuals, but we must admit the strong influence determined by society and culture that gives to women and men specific roles and functions.
The baby is in a sexually undifferentiated condition, namely that the primary sexual characteristics are present but the experience drives (previous Oedipus) are non-interpersonal (Winnicott, 1986). These experiences are not built so as interpersonal relationships are image processing physiological experiences (ibid. p.41). The child begins to experience sexual pleasure through various organs, is only interested in the feelings (which are cut off, partial) and does this without reproductive purposes and can thus be a perverse polimorfo2 (Freud, 1905).
libidinal orientation toward an object reaches the genital stage with organizing drives, in some way preparing the ground for the complex Edipo3. Sexual difference is not immediately involved in the development, giving rise to a kind of mental state bisexual (Ferenczi, 1966).
Age, and so the type of love object choice will depend from cultural model in which the family lives. Consider, for example, arranged marriages, where the desire and pleasure are completely overshadowed by economic interests and offspring, or even to pretend that the Catholic prohibitions virginity until marriage.
The development of identity, meaning heterosexual, is determined as a functional response to social and cultural needs welded on the meaning of reproduction.
We can not answer exactly how it determines the homosexual orientation, but some say that it is not biologically predetermined nor is a deviation or sexual perversion.
Straight or gay you are not born, but it becomes in long path of life, through his character, his identity, the environment in which we live, etc ... the same way, no sexual orientation is a choice, because with a cohesive identity and formed the subject of love will be only one. Furthermore, the unconditional love in this society, based on patriarchy, sexism and the dichotomous gender system is not allowed, if not for procreation, and what for many is the norm.
This work intends to investigate the intrapsychic and interpersonal development of an individual (often teenage) during the process of discovery and integration (coming out) of his homosexual identity.
Scientific research, especially in Italy, is very limited, so we will refer mainly to international research, hoping for a real and substantial interest from the topic. We will try to pay attention to the terms and adjectives, as in the scientific literature are found confusion about the term homosexual.
Often you use this expression with the same universality with which you use the word "man. It appears that only a small minority of studies analyzed specifically use the word lesbian, but for most of them the word homosexual is seen as a "category one". For this the following pages precede the women to men, as well as lesbian to gay.
0 comments:
Post a Comment